<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian Dusablon &#187; nerd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briandusablon.com/tag/nerd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briandusablon.com</link>
	<description>This is me. Simple.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rands In Repose: Managing Nerds</title>
		<link>http://www.briandusablon.com/2011/01/26/rands-in-repose-managing-nerds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briandusablon.com/2011/01/26/rands-in-repose-managing-nerds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briandusablon.com/?p=4513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nerds aren’t typically bitter; they’re just well informed. Snark from nerds is a leading indicator that I’m wasting their time and when I find it, I ask questions until I understand the inefficiency so I can change it or explain it. - Rands In Repose: Managing Nerds. This is a wonderful article. Whether you are a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nerds aren’t typically bitter; they’re just well informed. Snark from nerds is a leading indicator that I’m wasting their time and when I find it, I ask questions until I understand the inefficiency so I can change it or explain it.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.randsinrepose.com/archives/2011/01/17/managing_nerds.html">Rands In Repose: Managing Nerds</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a wonderful article. Whether you are a nerd or not, please read (and read some of his other posts) so you have a better understanding of how we&#8217;re wired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briandusablon.com/2011/01/26/rands-in-repose-managing-nerds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Confirmed: I&#8217;m a Nerd</title>
		<link>http://www.briandusablon.com/2008/10/14/its-confirmed-im-a-nerd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.briandusablon.com/2008/10/14/its-confirmed-im-a-nerd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briandusablon.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While perusing Aaron&#8217;s new website, I came across a survey he took in 2006 and couldn&#8217;t resist. Based on previous posts, I already knew I was a nerd, and that&#8217;s not such a bad thing. This survey is by no means scientific, but it seemed pretty accurate to me. My result for The Nerd? Geek? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While perusing Aaron&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.aaronsilvers.com">website</a>, I came across a survey he took in 2006 and couldn&#8217;t resist. Based on <a href="http://www.briandusablon.com/2007/11/16/i-am-a-nerd/">previous</a> <a href="http://www.briandusablon.com/2008/01/29/im-a-nerd-part-2-confirmation/">posts</a>, I already knew I was a nerd, and that&#8217;s not such a bad thing. This survey is by no means scientific, but it seemed pretty accurate to me.</p>
<p><em>My result for The Nerd? Geek? or Dork? Test&#8230;</em></p>
<h3>Pure Nerd</h3>
<p>70 % Nerd, 43% Geek, 13% Dork</p>
<p style="text-align:center"><img src="http://is2.okcupid.com/users/104/656/10465692962375378952/mt1124997268.jpg" width="" height="" /></p>
<blockquote><p>For The Record:</p>
<p>A Nerd is someone who is passionate about learning/being smart/academia.</p>
<p>A Geek is someone who is passionate about some particular area or subject, often an obscure or difficult one.</p>
<p>A Dork is someone who has difficulty with common social expectations/interactions.</p>
<p>You scored better than half in Nerd, earning you the title of: <b>Pure Nerd</b>.</p>
<p>The times, they are a-changing. It used to be that being exceptionally smart led to being unpopular, which would ultimately lead to picking up all of the traits and tendences associated with the &#8220;dork.&#8221; No-longer. Being smart isn&#8217;t as socially crippling as it once was, and even more so as you get older: eventually being a Pure Nerd will likely be replaced with the following label: Purely Successful.</p></blockquote>
<p>Take the <a href="http://www.helloquizzy.com/tests/the-nerd-geek-or-dork-test">Nerd? Geek? or Dork? Test</a> and let me know your results in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.briandusablon.com/2008/10/14/its-confirmed-im-a-nerd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

